Typo in documentation & two questions

[BruceEckel]

Typo

• First, we have the decorator, which lists the cowns that the upon which the behavior depends.

Questions

1. Could Cowns be typed: as in Cown[int], Cown[Frog], etc.
2. Would it make sense to add structured concurrency into the mix (instead of an explicit call to wait())?

[matajoh]

1. Cowns can definitely be typed! This is supported already.
2. We've considered a few designs for this (e.g. context managers), but there are a few outstanding features we need to add before we want to tackle this, namely what the API for libraries that use BOC will be (at the moment, only one module can use @when decorators) and "pinned cowns" which only are scheduled on the main interpreter. How these land (we're working on them right now) would play a big role in what the design for structured concurrency will look like.

If you have any ideas, we'd love to hear them :)